Bankers, Toffs and Tory Scum

SPS strike protest 2b


“Chav-bashing draws on a long, ignoble tradition of class hatred” – Owen Jones, Chavs: The Demonization Of The Working Class


Less than three weeks ago, fifty thousand people marched through central London almost entirely unnoticed. They came to protest the coalition government’s so-called “austerity” policies and to “demand the alternative”, but their message was lost in a fog of confusion about the undefined alternative they wanted to bring about. Was it the rose-tinted stroll back to the 1970s advocated by Owen Jones, or the peaceful, effortless and joyful revolution promised by Russell Brand? We still don’t know, because they still can’t decide.

Today, Britain observed what was hailed as the largest coordinated industrial action since the general strike of 1926 – but apart from some inconvenienced parents who had to endure the closure of their children’s schools, nobody seemed to notice that anything much was different. And what little serious press attention the strikes garnered was focused mainly on Ed Miliband’s untenable balancing act of supporting the strikers but deploring the strike, and the eyebrow-raising fact that the National Union of Teachers was legally permitted to use a 2012 vote by a fraction of its membership to hold a strike in 2014.

There is a lot of frustration on the British activist Left that they are not being listened to or taken seriously – by the public, the media, the Labour Party, anyone at all. But at some point soon, those people hawking conspiracy theories about a right-wing media cover-up or the dead hand of Ed Balls will have to turn the accusing gaze back in on themselves.

The Left has been shrieking about austerity for four years now, but have utterly failed to convince the electorate that they have a workable alternative. Indeed no alternative has been suggested – save for pumping pre-2010 (or even higher) levels of taxpayer money into the same unreformed government programmes, which is as patronising a suggestion as it is lazy. Worse still, the Left’s level of empathy or willingness to understand the viewpoints of others who do not agree with the “Down With Austerity” mantra is almost non-existent.

Big government apologists on the Left forever accuse the Conservative Party, UKIP and others on the right of stoking fears and indulging in emotional manipulation. Cases of grotesque welfare fraud are cherry-picked and non-representative, they insist, while questioning Britain’s immigration policy and relationship with the European Union is narrow minded at best, but more often a sign of shocking, premeditated race-baiting. But the left use these same techniques freely and often, and they do so in a way that hampers their ability to think of bold new policies to connect with middle Britain.

The bankers. David Cameron’s cabinet of millionaires. Billionaire non-doms. Tory scum. According to many on the Left, this motley crew of villains are not only deliberately rigging the system in their favour (arguably true), they actively delight in hurting the poor at every turn. Michael Gove is an arrogant bully and persecutor of teachers, Iain Duncan Smith is a virtual psychopath in his hounding of the destitute and David Cameron is the evil mastermind at the top, answerable only to Rupert Murdoch. It’s the age-old divide: those on the right think that Left-wingers are well-meaning but misguided, while those on the Left seem to sincerely believe that their right-wing opposites are actually evil.

The anti-Tory slogans and bitter invective have always had their place in Britain’s left-wing grass roots, but when this stubborn inability to empathise with or think like the other side starts to infect people who are supposedly the Labour movement’s greatest minds and political leaders, they have a real problem. The British Left, from Ed Miliband’s shadow cabinet on downwards, can’t seem to get past the mistaken notion – perhaps sincerely believed after so many years of constant, mindless repetition – that those on the right really do hate the poor and long to trample them underfoot.

But the anti-austerity protesters, the public sector strikers and their sympathisers on the Left are fighting a bitter battle against a straw man, a distorted vision of the real spectrum of right-wing thinking. While the British right generates ideas and (albeit limited by coalition) implements them in government, the Left rail against a cartoon foe of their own imagining, and almost completely fail to engage with the substance. Voters are able to discern this disconnect – the British left’s gradual conscious uncoupling from reality – which is one of the reasons why the Labour Party is making so little traction in what should be very fair political weather.

Attacking the usual left wing bogeymen – the bankers, toffs and Tory scum – is not an exciting, compelling pitch for an alternative to our present course. It’s the equivalent of a child’s temper tantrum. And whatever truth there is in the insults does not make up for the yawning chasm that exists where viable alternative left-wing policies should be.

In fact, such is the degree of hysteria and inability to comprehend the attitudes of others on the British Left, it is becoming comparable to the worst excesses of the Tea Party in America, where die-hard “patriots” can see no other motive for Barack Obama’s actions than the deliberate, treasonous undermining of the United States by a foreign-born, illegitimate president.

The hardcore US tea partiers have their hallucination of a Kenyan-born, Marxist stooge sent to make America collapse from within, while the British activist Left have their two-dimensional cartoon of the Bullingdon-bred, Eton-educated aristocrat who wants nothing less than the total dismantling of the social safety net and the subjugation of the poor in permanent poverty to be a source of cheap, expendable labour for his friends and benefactors in big business.

In America, the Republican Party tried to ride the Tea Party tiger, but ended up being eaten. The GOP is now completely beholden to its extremist base, and as a result is entirely unable to propose meaningful, workable legislation on anything from deficit reduction to healthcare to immigration reform. In Britain, the Labour Party is perilously close to suffering the same fate – willingly believing its own hyperbole about the callous Tories, and trying to convince itself (and us, the voters) that everything will be okay if only we start pumping more money into existing government programmes and taxing “the bankers” to pay for it all.

This is a depressing state of affairs on both sides of the Atlantic. To self-identify as a Republican in America today is increasingly akin to admitting that you are a reactionary, bigoted nincompoop, either beholden to corporate special interests or too stupid to realise that you are being manipulated by them. And unless something changes very soon, to self identify as a Labour supporter in Britain will proclaim to the world that you are a success-fearing simpleton who would rather see everyone dragged down to the same level of mediocrity than permit spectacular achievement at the expense of government-enforced equality of outcome.

The infinite monkey theorem states that a chimp sat in front of a typewriter will, given infinite time, at some point be bound to unthinkingly hit upon the long and complex sequence of keys that reproduces the complete works of William Shakespeare. By the same logic, if the British Left continue to hold strikes and mass rallies against austerity, probability dictates that eventually they will quite accidentally come up with a politically viable alternative to the coalition government’s spending plans. But unlike the monkeys, they and the Labour Party do not have infinite time.

The 2015 general election is less than ten months away.

16 thoughts on “Bankers, Toffs and Tory Scum

  1. chrishallamworldview September 11, 2014 / 9:06 AM

    “Yes, I am denying that the press are very right wing. Lots of people deny that, actually. There are certainly right-leaning papers, but there is also a generally left-leaning national broadcaster in the BBC, and plenty of left-sympathetic national and local papers.”
    Nonsense! Both the national and local press are overwhelmingly pro-Conservative. I’ve never heard anyone claim otherwise. The Telegraph, the Mail, the Express, The Sun, The Times. Are you denying any of these papers is right wing? And the BBC is hardly “left leaning” either.
    You are notably non-specific in naming any actual “left-sympathetic national and local papers” other than The Guardian or The Independent or in naming anyone else who agrees with you.


  2. angharadlois August 7, 2014 / 2:39 PM

    Let’s not conflate “the Left” with Ed Miliband’s shadow cabinet, eh? If that were the pinnacle of Left-wing political thought in this country, we really would be in trouble – Right-wing political commentators included, since a healthy opposition is vital to democracy.

    On the subject of press bias, I find it interesting to note that *everyone* thinks the BBC is biased against whatever political beliefs they happen to hold. It’s one thing that unites us as a country. Although they don’t always get it right, this does seem to suggest that they are doing a reasonable job of being neutral.


  3. chrishallamworldview July 17, 2014 / 9:53 AM

    Thanks Sam!
    1. Yes, you are probably right actually.
    2. Really? I am astonished to hear anyone say that the press is anything other than overwhelmingly right wing! (In fairness, I said “very right wing”. I should have said “very dominated by the right wing”. Clearly nearly all the national papers are very pro-Tory: The Sun, The Times, Telegraph, The Mail, The Express. Most local papers are too, in my experience. You are the first person who I have ever heard suggest otherwise and I doubt many people working for the press themselves would agree with you. The BBC is not “the press” nor is it left leaning although if you genuinely don’t see a right wing bias in today’s newspapers, I doubt your judgement on this!
    3. No, I did not do that. However, it is quite possible for some in a group to sympathise with Russell Brand while others sympathise more with Owen Jones while still being united in the common aims of a strike. Most Tory voters don’t seem to favour equal marriage rights as Mr Cameron does, but still they remain with him.
    4. Odd isn’t it that a Labour Government in Britain caused such a dramatic global slump which had such a massive impact throughout the world! Surely the fact that so many who lost their jobs were in the private sector rather undermines this argument as does the fact that the Tories were arguing far more deregulation not less. Brown’s bold action on quantitive easing arguably prevented the banking system collapsing completely. I think history will judge him more kindly than we do. He certainly had many failings as a leader but from an economic point of view, I’m glad he was at the helm and not a lightweight like Cameron.
    Do I think Cameron is evil? Not at all. I’d be surprised if Miliband thinks that or would ever use the term. I do not doubt that figures like IDS and Gove find it much easier to scapegoat and target the poor than they do bigger targets like the Murdoch empire.
    We all have our “bogeymen”! To me it seems to make more sense to attack the government who are actually in power, a right wing and flawed powerful press and the banking system. You would rather demonise the Opposition and members of our enfeebled trade unions.
    Fair enough! Labour do have problems but clearly so do the Tories!
    Thanks again,


  4. chrishallamworldview July 14, 2014 / 11:18 AM

    1. The strikes did have less impact than they would have done in the past. This is because the unions have been greatly weakened.
    2. The newspapers are dominated by the Right hence why they gave the strikers’ cause very short shrift. Are you denying the press are very right wing? I suspect many would disagree with you that this is just some crazy conspiracy theory.
    3. The strike seemed fairly united in purpose to me.
    4. The bankers, Tories and right wing press do have a lot to answer for. Who do you blame for our nation’s ills? The BBC? Political correctness? Tony Blair? Immigrants? Benefit “scroungers”?
    Labour do have a lead in the polls currently. Clearly, most people’s outlook on these things differs from yours!
    Thanks for your views though.


    • Semi-Partisan Sam July 16, 2014 / 9:15 PM

      Many thanks for reading and taking the time to comment. Some responses to your various points:

      1. Yes, the unions are a lot less strong than they were when they crippled the country in the 1970s (good thing too, many would say). So the trades union made a big error in setting expectations about the strike too high. All we heard in the run-up was how big and widespread they would be, and how they would make the country stop, sit up and take notice. If nothing else, it was very bad expectations management by the unions to talk up “the biggest industrial action since the 1926 general strike” and then fail to deliver.

      2. Yes, I am denying that the press are very right wing. Lots of people deny that, actually. There are certainly right-leaning papers, but there is also a generally left-leaning national broadcaster in the BBC, and plenty of left-sympathetic national and local papers. And yet even those outlets which should have been cheerleading the strikers (the Guardian, Independent to name the largest) struggled to muster any enthusiasm.

      3. I attended the rally in London and actually spoke to many of the strikers and their fellow protesters. I’m not sure if you did the same, or if you have some extra insight into their minds that I might not have picked up on through actually being there.

      4. The “bankers” do have something to answer for – though it would be great if people could stop screaming about “the bankers” in general and get a little more specific rather than tarring a whole profession. The Tories weren’t in power when the UK was ravaged by the great depression, and hadn’t been for a decade, so they really don’t have that much to answer for in terms of the economic downturn. The Labour Party, on the other hand, spent 13 years making more and more people dependent on government for one thing or another, subsidising low wage jobs with tax credits and other ill-conceived ideas, making much of the population uniquely vulnerable to government spending cuts than would have been the case if the Labour government had fostered a culture of self-reliance and individual empowerment. But of course that would go against everything that Labour believes in – they need people vested in the big government state to shore up their voting base.

      That probably gives you some idea of where I lay the blame for the nation’s ills – nothing about the BBC (left-leaning though it may be), political correctness, immigrants or benefit scroungers. It seems as though you are fighting a battle against a two-dimensional caricature of a right-winger, rather than the real thing. Ed Miliband and the Labour Party are doing the same thing, imagining their opponents as intolerant, reactionary, paranoid little Englanders. It’s a dangerous delusion.

      As to whether most peoples’ outlook on these things differs from mine, we’ll see when the general election comes around. But I would say that Ed Miliband’s dismal ratings as party leader and the Labour Party’s relatively small poll lead four years into a difficult coalition government should give them a lot of cause for concern.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.