There may be no more worlds for the regressive Left to conquer, but the warriors of the Social Justice Army still see enemies all around
This blog has spent some time explaining that the Cult of Social Justice and Identity Politics is far less about helping genuinely oppressed people and far more about a small, snarling pseudo-intellectual clerisy seeking to use the often dubiously legitimate suffering of various proscribed victim groups as a means of wielding power and influence over wider society.
It follows, then, that for this cult to perpetuate itself there must be a constant stream of wronged victims at all times, on whose behalf the social justice priests and priestesses can claim to speak. When your career and entire worldview is built on the bedrock of seeking to end “oppression”, one inevitably sees oppression everywhere and in the smallest of things. To acknowledge that we actually live in an historically free and prosperous era would be to admit that their services are no longer required – that their whole raison d’être is no more.
And this is why even now, when the fruits of SJW hyper-sensitivity, snarling authoritarianism and utter contempt for ideological agnostics lie strewn across the political landscape in the form of President-elect Donald Trump and a Republican-dominated Congress, that portion of the American Left which has fallen under the spell of the Cult of Social Justice and Identity Politics cannot admit wrongdoing or overreach, and refuses to change tactics or re-examine their mission.
This is why despite having lost the White House by racking up superfluous votes in liberal enclaves while actively chasing away votes in key swing states with their out-of-touch policies and narratives, the bulk of the American Left and the Democratic Party are unable to conceive of any other possible course of action than shouting the same shrill, divisive message even louder.
Ben Shapiro captures the essence of the problem in a great piece for the National Review:
For decades, the Left consistently put front and center its vision of an America in which Republicans were victimizers: Either they were evil racists, or they were John Lithgow–in-Footloose holier-than-thou sexual prudes, or they were old-style Mad Men sexists looking to shove women back into the kitchen. Celebrities helped push these narratives through the stories they told, the movies they filmed, the books they wrote.
And Americans accepted the critiques.
Americans accepted racial equality. Americans celebrated female empowerment. Americans went libertarian on sexual behavior.
And the Left had to go searching for a new civil-rights struggle with which to cram conservatives back into their “victimizer” cubbyhole.
There was, however, one problem: All the good civil-rights issues have been dealt with already. And so the Left, which focuses all of its efforts on social issues, was relegated to pushing crime-increasing myths about the evils of cops; the celebrities were forced to pretend that men peeing next to women was the next great Martin Luther King, Jr.–style struggle; Democrats were forced to march on their next target, not merely church involvement in state, but private beliefs of churchgoers.
And herein lies the biggest problem facing the American Left: America is the most tolerant country in world history. There are no more serious civil-rights struggles for the Left to push. In fact, the Left now pushes against civil rights in its ignorant search for the new struggle: Religious bakers must be destroyed if they won’t bake a cake for a same-sex wedding; young girls must be forced to go to the same bathroom as middle-aged men, hosts on HGTV must be policed for belief in Scripture regarding sexual sin.
No wonder Americans reacted by telling the Left to shove it.
That phenomenon could very well continue. The Left has run out of aggressors to target; instead, they’ve become the aggressors, self-righteous morality police dedicated to wiping out dissenting thought. Americans aren’t up for that sort of thing. We think we’re pretty tolerant people, and, by and large, we are. Trump won, at least in part, by refusing to kowtow to the Left’s newest social crusades, in word if not in deed.
And Shapiro’s conclusion may well prove prophetic, unless the American Left change course:
In Die Hard, villain Hans Gruber misquotes Plutarch: “And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer.” The Left will never recognize that simple fact — and so they will push ever onward, steadily encroaching on liberty and driving a blowback they cannot comprehend.
There may be no more worlds to conquer, but the Left is strangely unwilling to disband its standing army – or rather is unable to do so, knowing that their electoral coalition of competing special interests and designated victim classes is only held together so long as there is a clear Enemy Oppressor to fight.
Having helped to achieve civil rights, women’s equality and gay rights, the American Left should now be beating its swords into ploughshares, hanging up the social justice armour and generating a tide to lift the boats of all Americans (including the maligned white working class), not only their favoured interest groups.
Hint: this might have something to do with trying to solve the great political question of our time, as frequently mentioned on this blog.
But they can’t. There are too many greedy over-powerful generals to feed and reward with war spoils, and these generals (the leaders of the various social justice movements) in turn must keep their troops happy by providing them with bounty in the form of political victories, legislative accomplishments and tangible real-world perks – including those which encroach on individual freedom, as Ben Shapiro notes.
Thus the American Left has become an unstoppable social justice juggernaut, perpetually seeking out new offences to take outrage over, in order to give the troops something to do and keep the fractious coalition together a little longer.
Even if Democratic Party leaders could see the folly of their present path (and the re-election of Nancy Pelosi as House Minority Leader clearly shows that the vast majority still do not get it) they would be powerless to change course. The unfolding slow-motion car crash is not pleasant to watch. As Ben Shapiro notes, the fury of the American Left (and the British Left too, to a slightly lesser extent) is “driving a blowback they cannot comprehend”.
While plenty of Donald Trump supporters may spend their leisure hours percolating in an online ideological echo chamber, their necessary interaction with a broadly large-L Liberal media and culture means that they are at least constantly aware of the existence other political viewpoints. Conservative college and university students often learn how to debate, defend and refine their ideas through having them constantly challenged and disparaged on campus.
Not so for the Left. Depending on geography and occupation, it is entirely possible for many on the Left to go for long periods (interrupted only by the odd traumatic microaggression experienced when venturing beyond their safe space or carefully curated social media feeds) without ever bumping into the Other America at all. Judging by the ongoing howls of outraged incomprehension, some on the Left only ever glimpse this America once every four years, at presidential election time.
This is why the American Left is unlikely to change course, even now. When your view of the path ahead is skewed to the side so that you cannot see the iceberg field directly ahead, the first light impact may not persuade you of the need to stop or change course. Nor may the second, slightly more jarring collision with reality. And only when a massive head-on collision holes your social movement and political party beneath the waterline does the folly become truly apparent.
Support Semi-Partisan Politics with a one-time or recurring donation:
Agree with this article? Violently disagree? Scroll down to leave a comment.
Follow Semi-Partisan Politics on Twitter, Facebook and Medium.
Reblogged this on SJW's Shut up, sit down, and listen.
If you’re familiar with the work of Jonathan Haidt then you’re aware of the concept of Grand Narratives.
The human mind is a story processor, not a logic processor. We deal with life through narratives and metaphors, not through logical analysis of objective facts.
The real world of human social behavior is an emergent complex system far greater than the sum of its parts.
It is far too big for us to comprehend all at once. It is physically impossible for any single human brain or group of brains to contain all the facts related to any particular social or moral issue.
And even if the brain could HOLD all the facts, the real world is far too complex for it to PROCESS all of them in a way that could reliably and consistently foresee the final outcome of any particular social policy.
So the brain reduces, simplifies, the real world to a narrative, a story, a vision, of what it is, can be, and should be.
Those stories are based on a set of assumptions, a set of “facts” that are assumed to be ground truth.
Moral foundations are the color receptors of the moral eye. They’re also cognitive processing modules with which understand what we perceive.
The more of them we employ, the better is our perception and understanding of the social world.
Liberals employ about half of them, and of that half mostly just “care.”
Conservatives employ all of them in relatively equal balance.
This explains the data which shows that conservatives understand liberals and human nature better than liberals understand conservatives and human nature
The presumption that the liberal and conservative grand narratives are equally perceptive, and equally right or wrong, about human nature – just in different subject areas – is false.
The fact of the matter is that while no narrative is 100% correct, the conservative narrative is more right than wrong and the liberal narrative is more wrong than right.
The conservative grand narrative is for the most part a recitation of human history.
The liberal grand narrative is in essence a conspiracy theory woven from cherry picked facts.
I would disagree with Ben Shapiro on one small aspect. The Social Justice Left do comprehend the blowback *but* the blowback merely confirms what they already believed, that ‘white men’ remain full of hate towards those they oppress, that women voting for Trump are victims of internalised misogyny, that non-whites have internalised oppression and are voting against their own freedoms.
This is the horrible truth of what the cult of Social Justice has done to the Left – it has taught that their senses themselves are maladjusted and they see lies everywhere.
No wonder so many of them have mental health issues – they live in a world in which they must be paranoid of their own minds.
Reblogged this on michaelsnaith.