Only The Brave Now Dare Admit To Being Conservative Or Eurosceptic

Tory Scum - Graffiti Car

When ordinary people with perfectly mainstream opinions are hesitant to express themselves for fear of being accused of racism, prejudice, stupidity or worse, our democracy is in real trouble

If you voted Conservative or UKIP at the 2015 general election, you could be forgiven for wondering where the other fifteen million people who made the same choice are currently hiding themselves. David Cameron’s leadership may be uninspiring and his government’s achievements few, but these are hardly the paranoid, dying days of the Brown government – ordinarily there should still be a level of authentic, spontaneous support to be found out and about the country.

Equally, you may wonder how on earth it was possible for Ed Miliband and Labour to have lost that election, given the fact that social media and popular culture roar their hatred of the Evil Tories louder than ever, that it is almost impossible to find kindred spirits willing to admit to voting Conservative or UKIP, and the fact that conservative policies and beliefs are routinely derided as ignorant and selfish at best, and violent and vengeful at worst.

The current political environment can be quite lonely for anybody with conservative leanings – and it makes one wonder why the people who delivered David Cameron his House of Commons majority and propelled UKIP into a remarkably strong third place are so desperate to avoid drawing attention to themselves.

There have been a couple of worrying pieces in the media this week which highlight the fact that furious open hostility toward anything vaguely conservative or eurosceptic – often emanating from a small but determined band of opposing activists – is having a chilling effect on the political discourse and preventing small-c conservatives from openly articulating their opinions.

First, the Independent carries a letter from former Labour MP Tom Harris, who only felt able to “come out” as a eurosceptic after having left elected office. Sounding as though a weight had been lifted off his shoulders, Harris writes:

I was never a fully paid-up member of the Euro team. Early signs of unsoundness manifested themselves in my outright opposition to British membership of the euro when it was first launched. The whips’ office had its eye on me after I added my signature to a letter, back in 2002, warning the then Chancellor, Gordon Brown, to resist committing to abolishing the pound. And once you’ve decided to oppose that central mechanism for the creation of a European superstate, it’s a fairly short step to being painted as “anti-EU”.

But my instinct to vote Leave (probably running at 53 to 55 per cent right now) is not something that can be confessed in polite middle-class company. Such an admission might too easily be interpreted as a dislike of foreigners or, worse, a tolerance of Nigel Farage.

[..] The question is precisely the same one we were asked in 1975: should we stay or should we go? In the meantime, if asked over dinner how I intend to vote, I’ll do the sensible thing and change the subject to the range of breads in the Marks & Spencer food hall. Or The Archers.

And follows up in the Telegraph:

As for me, I will continue to pursue this enigma known as “the normal life” by having, expressing, then rejecting various opinions. No doubt they will be variously correct, wrong, misplaced, insightful and dangerous. I may believe in all of them, some of them, or none of them.

What’s it to you?

But among Labour circles and much of the wider Left, it is simply no longer “permissible” to hold eurosceptic views, or to believe that Britain’s democracy and vital national interests would be better served by leaving an explicitly political and ever-more closely integrating union which we never realised we were joining in the first place. The Tories are perceived to be eurosceptic (even though many of them are not), and so the prevailing dogma has it that one must be pro-EU to be anti-Tory.

Aside from the few brave (and mostly decidedly retro) souls who form Labour Leave, the question of Britain’s ongoing EU membership simply is not up for discussion. And to express any doubt whatsoever about Britain playing an enthusiastic part in this European political union is seen as treachery, automatic disqualification from membership of the movement.

Look at Jeremy Corbyn’s reversal on the issue. Love or hate Corbyn, he has been willing to stand up to a mostly hostile Parliamentary Labour Party on issue after issue, from military action in Syria to the Paris attacks to the question of Trident renewal. On all of these issues, the Labour leader has proven himself willing to enrage many of his MPs by holding firm to his deeply held convictions.

But what of his eurosceptic convictions? Jeremy Corbyn has been a lifelong eurosceptic, and voted for Britain to leave the European Community in the 1975 referendum. Corbyn holds this view about as strongly as any other, and yet it was on this issue alone where he instantly capitulated to the establishment and became a pro-EU advocate. What should rightly be a non-partisan issue pertaining to sovereignty and self-determination is instead imbued with nearly the same cultural weight and quasi-religious fervour as one finds in the American culture wars. Such is the power of the Left’s infatuation with the EU.

Jeremy Corbyn - EU Referendum - 1975 - Eurosceptic

The second article of concern is this worrying testimonial from a conservative-leaning history supply teacher who found himself drummed out of the school where he taught because colleagues complained when he failed to join in their frequent denunciations of the Tory government and all things conservative.

Joe Baron writes in The Spectator:

After keeping schtum for two months, I finally challenged a colleague’s view of the Tories. ‘Why are Tory voters thick?’ I asked. ‘Is it just because they happen to disagree with you?’

‘No,’ he replied. ‘Because they voted for cuts’.

‘Perhaps they saw the cuts as necessary,’ I said. ‘Surely it’s better to make savings now, rather than keep spending money we don’t have, go bankrupt and, like the Labour government of 1976, be forced to make even deeper cuts after going cap in hand to the IMF.’

‘That’s rubbish!’ said another colleague. And so it continued, though no one actually raised their voices, until they brushed off my argument with a blasé ‘yeah, yeah, yeah’ before gesturing towards the office door as if dismissing a recalcitrant child.

If Joe Baron had been loudly and forthrightly expressing his views in favour of Ed Miliband and the Labour Party, he would have been met with a chorus of approval and the respect of his colleagues. But in choosing to defend conservative ideas like government fiscal responsibility and personal self-sufficiency, Baron chose another path. A darker path:

I was called into the head’s office and told that, after a complaint from colleagues in my department, the school would no longer require my services. So I was effectively being dismissed for holding the wrong views, though of course the head dressed it up in a different garb: it was my manner rather than my opinions. Apparently I was ‘too assertive’.

As I remember it, my interlocutors were both red-faced and angry, and more than willing to use inflammatory language. I was told, at one point, that I was unfit to teach.

Interestingly, the head of department who refused to work with me — effectively calling for my dismissal — had several weeks previously decried the cruelty of zero-hours contracts. Where was her left-wing compassion when it came to sacking me, a married man with two children to support?

I suppose I’ve only got myself to blame. For a brief moment, I deluded myself into believing that schools actually encouraged tolerance and the questioning of orthodoxies through intellectual exploration, freedom of thought and speech. How silly of me.

Both cases – Tom Harris the former MP and Joe Baron the supply teacher – are examples of the visceral, real-world retribution which is threatened (and sometimes carried out) by those on the Left against people who have committed the thought crime of being a conservative. And this climate of anti-Tory hate-mongering not only distorts our political discourse, but undermines the health of our democracy, whose proper functioning relies on people with political differences being able to speak their consciences in good faith.

My own personal experience of this phenomenon has thrown up more depressing anecdotes than I can relate here. Friends who have sat next to me on the couch shouting at the television when one smug-faced Question Time panellist (or audience member) after another have deliberately misinterpreted and sanctimoniously condemned Nigel Farage or David Cameron, but who fall fearfully silent when the inevitable anti-Tory hate mobs form around the water cooler or on social media.

Or the senior PR executive I was chatting with at a recent event for the launch of Dan Hodges’ excellent chronicle of the 2015 general election, “One Minute To Ten”, who furtively looked around and dropped her voice to a hushed whisper before confiding to me that she actually voted Conservative, picking David Cameron over Ed Miliband.

Or the look on the faces of people I speak with in my hometown of Harlow, Essex, at the precise moment when a voice in the back of their head tells them to self-censor their speech and hold back their real opinions, for fear of ridicule or attack. They may have re-elected an excellent local Conservative MP in Robert Halfon, but few are willing to proudly and publicly stand by their decision months later, away from the privacy of the polling booth.

You just don’t see this same reticence on the other side. For a political movement which makes a great performance of supposedly being the voice of the voiceless and most marginalised people in the country, left-wingers have a near monopoly in many areas of the public discourse, particularly in the arts and entertainment sectors. And there are far fewer occasions or settings where it is necessary to pause and “read the room” before confessing one’s left-wingery than there are situations where conservatives have brutally learned the wisdom of self-censorship.

The problem is that it is not just the unhinged crazies sharing misspelled memes on the internet and typing in ALL CAPS below the line on news website articles. People like that exist on all points on the political spectrum from left to right, and the misogynistic ranting of one barking CyberKipper no more represents UKIP than the conspiratorial, anti-Semitic sermons of a self-declared Corbyn supporter reflect on Labour.

No, the real problem is the softer bigotry of bien-pensant public opinion – the arrogant assumptions of the dinner party set, well-heeled professional people in the office or having dinner at Carluccio’s – the middle class clerisy, Brendan O’Neill called them. Their willingness to lazily believe and repeat hysterical left-wing smears about conservatism and to virtue-signal in front of their friends by flaunting their vague and incoherent opposition to the Evil Tory government are the problem.

And it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The more that left-wingers openly flaunt their views while attacking or shunning anybody who thinks differently, the more likely they are to only ever hear ideas and opinions which chime with their own worldviews, and falsely assume that they are universal.

But it’s not true. The 2015 general election proved that there is no silent left-wing majority in Britain, and there will be no “rainbow coalition” of left-wing political parties coming together to kick the Evil Tories out of office any time soon.

In fact, the only question is how much longer the Left can continue to punch above their rhetorical weight before the British people finally tire of the sanctimonious yapping of a bunch of ideologically incoherent, virtue-signalling, anti-aspirational opportunists and the temper tantrum they are throwing in the face of a very mild and utterly unremarkable centrist government.

How much longer will the silent majority-makers of this country be willing to silence themselves, censor their speech and edit their public opinions solely to avoid the screeching disapproval of these losers?

Right now, it may be hard for some to “come out” as conservatives. But the Left are loudly and brazenly overplaying a very weak hand, and the sooner that more of us start calling them out on it, the easier it will be for more people to stand up and take pride in not being just another centre-left drone.

Iain Duncan Smith - Tory Scum - Conservative Party - Nazis

Agree with this article? Violently disagree? Scroll down to leave a comment.

Follow Semi-Partisan Politics on TwitterFacebook and Medium.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Only The Brave Now Dare Admit To Being Conservative Or Eurosceptic

  1. Hilary Bedeman February 24, 2016 / 4:33 AM

    I don’t see how 11,334,576 turns into 15 million – tory and labour are both minority parties – tory with 24.4% and labour with 20.1% – even combined, don’t have a majority of the voting public.

    The system is archaic and ridiculous and doesn’t benefit the people who pay for it, even one bit.

    Like

  2. vickster51 February 19, 2016 / 10:32 AM

    Thoroughly interesting post and I suppose the fact that my first thought was that you were brave to write it adds weight to your view that uttering anything remotely right wing leads to trouble! I apologise for what I expect will be quite a long comment too. I find myself truly frustrated by our political system and therefore cannot really claim to be a supporter of any one party. I agree with certain views and policies of one party, disagree with others and support another party on other issues. I therefore try and be as informed as possible before forming a view prior to any election and won’t enter the debate already decided on which side I am going to vote for. Persuade me with your arguments and I’ll be more open to your views.

    However, I absolutely agree with you that in our current society you are simply not allowed to express publicly any view other than one seen as being on the Left, unless that is you are prepared for abuse and insults, some of which can be quite agressive in nature. I say this from experience, after tweeting my frustration at one of the protest marches about the government, where I simply said I bet a lot of them didn’t even bother to vote in the first place. I didn’t express a political view either way, as I still tend to believe that your vote is a private matter and was more frustrated that I hear so many people say they didn’t vote and yet then protest about the outcome. I can hold that view regardless of who I voted for.

    What followed was what I can only describe as an attack by people known to me, through friends of friends, resulting in being labelled clearly as a Tory and therefore lacking intelligence and a soul! It made me very angry, but was also very upsetting to be ganged up on, for one view on one specific event, for which my political “side” and charcater had been prejudged and found lacking. It has definitely had an effect on me. I do now consider everything remotely political before I say anything, as honestly I don’t want to experience that again, in person and online. It has also clouded my view of individuals who are staunchly Left wing. I accept it’s unfair of me to do so, but I now expect most people on social media who have always voted on the Left and never been open to another viewpoint to be potentially just as nasty. Politics aside, to feel it’s acceptable to treat someone else in such a way is so far away from my own mentality (to try and respect and understand another’s viewpoint and try and be as decent towards others as you can), that it has clouded my view of a whole side of supporters on the political spectrum, a side I was never and am still not “against” as they see it. As someone open to ideas and arguments in order to form my views, rather than seeing any side through rose tinted glasses, surely we are the types that both sides should be trying to convert? I also find it interesting that I have hardly ever seen on social media such attacks going from Right to Left. Perhaps they have already figured out that insulting someone is not the best approach. Once you’ve told someone they are lacking intelligence and a soul, they are less inclined to feel they belong on your team.

    I have friends across the political spectrum. We are all young adults, value each other’s friendships and respect that we are all individuals coming at life’s problems from a different perspective. Not everyone can agree on what the best solution is. Sometimes I agree with the Right and sometimes the Left. However what I don’t do is attack anyone for whatever view they have. That isn’t the way to persuade someone to think differently. Ironically, I assume by writing this and agreeing with your post, that I’ll almost certainly be labelled as on the dark side of the force and receive more abuse. I’ll be brave and take that chance..

    Like

  3. Clive Lord February 16, 2016 / 12:46 AM

    Sam, I repeat, although not personally driven to extreme utterances or actions, I do understand why this government is hated as much as Thatcher was. The benefits sanctions and Work Capability Assessments regime is a whole order of magnitude greater than the reasonable examples of hard decisions you mentioned in previous exchanges.
    You see this government as not aiming for ‘small government’ as you think it should. I see it as doing a competent job of ensuring that the rich don’t lose out due to austerity, and demonization of and gratuitous cruelty towards the most vulnerable is part of this strategy.

    Like

  4. Douglas Carter February 14, 2016 / 10:02 AM

    It’s possible that the very large number of right-leaning, but otherwise uncommitted, voters out there don’t identify as ‘Conservatives’? They look to the current, and recent variants of the Conservative Party and see something they can’t reconcile their own viewpoints with? That eventually they reluctantly place a vote with the Conservatives – more in spite of Cameron’s tenure than because of it – because it becomes the defacto winner of that particular least-ugly competition?

    Personally I haven’t voted Conservative since 1987 – and even then Thatcher was a radical, and not really a Conservative. Since then, no party has really wanted my vote (with the arguable exception of the Referendum Party during its brief life) but whilst I share a mix of views which variously could be pigeonholed as right or left wing, the only potential waiting Governments on the horizon are formulated rigorously around a mediocre left\centre status quo. I wouldn’t necessarily be cowed into suppressing and admittance for support for such a left-wing Conservative Party; it would be more that I would feel personally blemished for endorsing them in their current state. However, I’d also incline to admit I’m not certain that the amount of damage that Major, Blair and Brown managed to inflict on the country across twenty years is now reversible. The challenge is now more rebuilding rather than conserving. So possibly the term itself – ‘Conservative’ – has become redundant in the UK sphere?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s