George Osborne’s Last Straw vs My Back

George Osborne is receiving a lot of stick for his last-minute decision to postpone the planned 3p/litre increase in fuel tax left intact in his most recent, politically disastrous budget. Most recently he has been accused of cowardice for sending an unprepared junior minister – Economic Secretary Chloe Smith – to defend the government’s short notice U-turn on the BBC’s flagship ‘Newsnight’ programme.

Reports The Telegraph:

Chloe Smith last night strugged to answer questions about the decision to postpone the 3p rise in petrol duty.

After she refused to say when she found out about it or how it will be funded, the Economic Secretary was accused of being “incompetent” by Jeremy Paxman, the BBC’s Newsnight interviewer.

Mr Paxman also asked her whether she ever woke up and thought: “My God, what am I going to be told today?”

I think that we can now safely add political incompetence to the list of charges being levelled against Mr. Osborne in the wake of this all-too-avoidable mess up.

This is supposed to be a Conservative-led, tax-cutting government. It was bad enough that the 3p/litre increase in fuel duty was allowed to remain in George Osborne’s most recent budget in the first place, but the fact that it’s postponement was only announced yesterday, and that senior ministers had no prior notice whatsoever is an almost unforgivable act of political stupidity, for which David Cameron was predictably savaged during Prime Minister’s Questions today.

But more concerning to me even than the incompetent way that this – and almost every single other political decision of any significance recently – has been handled by the government is the fact that the Conservatives are boasting about their policy U-turn and rather petulantly demanding praise for their actions.

Take this typical tweet from Robert Halfon MP:

“In Welsh questions said to Minister that stoppage of August fuel tax rise means £16 million injected into Welsh economy”

I despair, I really do. I thought that it was only in the dystopian, nightmarish land that was Gordon Brown’s Britain that cancelling a planned tax increase could be said in any way to be injecting cash into the economy. How is making the decision to not do something monumentally stupid and increase a key tax that would punish many already-squeezed households in any way an injection of cash into the economy? At best it could very charitably be called a preservation of the status quo, or the maintenance of steady-state, though given the economic uncertainty created by arbitrary and last-minute changes of key fiscal policy such as this, even that assessment is doubtful.

This is almost as bad as the risible time when a desperate Gordon Brown and Peter Mandelson tried to claim that the Conservatives’ election manifesto promise to cancel the planned increase in employers’ National Insurance tax contributions would “take millions of pounds out of the economy”, as though the state were the ‘real economy’ and not the other way around.

I’m done with all this, I really am. I actively campaigned for the Conservative Party at the last general election in 2010. I delivered leaflets, probably annoyed my friends on Facebook and Twitter with my political posts, and talked to countless people on the high street. And for my efforts, and those of all the many people who did far more than me to try to end Labour’s grip on power in this country, all we get is a government with a broken political radar, one which betrays core conservative principles and apparently one which pouts and expects praise and candy for doing precisely the things that it should be doing without any outside pressure from their political base, such as not raising taxes on squeezed households during a recession.

Michael Gove for PM, as soon as possible. Anyone else with me?

2 thoughts on “George Osborne’s Last Straw vs My Back

  1. stuart's avatar stuart June 27, 2012 / 3:59 PM

    You are missing the point, the conservatives did not get enough votes and they had to form a coalition. The government is not conservative therefore it cannot just have core conservative principles. The fact is, that with a prime minister that everyone hated David Cameron failed to get enough votes (most people dislike him and Osbourne). And if you seriously think Micheal Gove is the answer then you are really very deluded.

    Like

    • Samuel Hooper's avatar belindasgallery June 27, 2012 / 5:24 PM

      Stuart, I appreciate the response and the feedback. My concern is that I believe that even without the hindrance of the Lib Dems in coalition, David Cameron’s particular brand of conservatism would be doing pretty much the same thing when it comes to tax policy. This isn’t like gay marriage or House of Lords reform or the 50% top rate of income tax that we’re talking about, where the Lib Dems staked a firm red line – the Conservatives did this one to themselves, and that is what worries me.

      So yes, they have themselves betrayed core conservative principles, even without the prompting of their coalition partners.

      Michael Gove is perhaps the strongest conviction politician in the cabinet on the Conservative side, with the added advantage of being able to articulate his beliefs and vision clearly and compellingly (perhaps because they are, y’know, actually his own). Therefore I think he would be an excellent candidate for Conservative leader and PM, and I see nothing deluded about holding this view.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.